Patriarchy Proves the Point of #tooFEW

In my last post I told you about the exciting project I’m working on with folks around the country, and now world, who are interested in editing wikipedia so that it better reflects the diversity of our living.

I was on Al Jazeera’s The Stream talking about problematic representations of Black women in the media when the folks there learned about the #tooFEW initiative.

We did another interview about #tooFEW and we talked about some of the backlash we’d received. As more folks learned about the project, more folks are interested and more folks were hateful.

I fielded some tweets that were a little dismissive but what was most surprising was looking at the page announcing our event.

Someone edited our wiki event page, changing the location to “DICKS”. They or another person also trying to discredit our event signed up “empowered tool of the patriarchy” to attend as well as deleted all of our pages to be edited, replacing them with “Adolf Hitler.”

Wikipedia_Meetup_Feminists Engage Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia-2   Wikipedia_Meetup_Feminists Engage Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia-1-1

 

What was initially an opportunity to empower marginalized voices through proactive action, now further illustrates the necessity of itself and other projects like it. By editing the Feminists Engage Wikipedia page in these ways, patriarchy is proved real. Clearly some editors of wikipedia have the very biases we are attempting to counteract with our edits. If you look at our retrieved list of edits (thank you Wikipedia for your extensive history features, and we can see your IP address when you do stuff like this) most of what we’d like to do is add people and ideas that aren’t present on the site currently. We are editing entries that are relevant to our communities. I say this to say we are working on pages that are already marginalized within Wikipedia and we are being attacked.

Someone asked via Twitter, why make such a big deal about #tooFEW. Why not just edit consistently.  I explained that for some this may be their first opportunity to edit.

Twitter _ crunkfeminists_ @NosniborPC for many #tooFEW ...

 

We are understood  as using “activist-speak” for simply trying to bring together marginalized folks who are consistently edited out of history. This attack on the event page even before we start to edit is disheartening. Why would marginalized groups want to edit if this is how they are treated when they try to engage Wikipedia initially?

This also has me thinking about the utility of publicity. It’s wonderful to get the word out about #tooFEW but incredibly saddening that it incites attacks. We won’t be thwarted though. This is exactly why #tooFEW is so necessary.

6 Comments

Filed under DH, Me

6 Responses to Patriarchy Proves the Point of #tooFEW

  1. Pingback: Signal Boost! #tooFew Feminists Engage Wikipedia 3/15 11-3 EST | Diaspora Hypertext, the Blog

  2. Moya: Thanks for this post (and see you soon at #tooFEW). I must admit that my ongoing online investigations make me pretty sure that “virality” and any other form of “publicity” or “self-branding” or even, dare I say, “spreadability,” are not what activists need online. What we do need is more of what you/we are doing on these and other more quiet, intimate, and activist spaces.

  3. Fantastic idea! Plus, Wikipedia has options to undo changes and revert to a previous version if the page is vandalized. Further, if the vandalism is continuous, this will get the Wikipedia editors involved. After the Scientology fiasco, Wikipedia editors are much more involved in protecting content. I will talk this up as much as I can. Strength and courage to you all.

  4. ekwhite

    This seems to be a worthwhile and ambitious project – I don’t understand why you are being attacked. Good luck in your project from a 60-year old white male.

  5. Hooray! Keep it up! As we learned with the trials and tribulations around the Tropes vs. Women in Video Games Kickstarter, the best response is to never give up!

  6. Pingback: Knowledge Construction on Wikipedia: Part II | Ways of Seeing

and...